Phil Spector's mugshot back in February of 2003
Phil Spector's Mugshot (with wig) from the Los Angeles County Jail after his conviction in April 2009
Phil Spector (sans wig) at North Kern State Prison, June 2009
Well, Phil's mugshot finally hit The Smoking Gun and TMZ websites today. What can I say? Uhm... Nothing. His mugshots kind of speak for themselves! There will be more mugshots of Phil in the future. The next one will most likely be the one they take when he is moved from North Kern to whatever facility they decide will be his "permanent" home.
I have to wonder if (now that his newest mugshot has hit the internet) we get to hear another media blitz from Rachelle? Or maybe she'll stay quiet this time? From what I've read, her last few interviews weren't believed by very many people... After all, who wants to hear about her sex life with Phil? I sure don't!
Here's another comparison for you... Take a look at these two photos. Compare the two women. Which one looks "older"? Lana or Rachelle?
Update (3/16/2011):
Please note that this blog post was written nearly 2 years ago. The blog post was originally written in response to a discussion on the InSession Message board that no longer exists in cyberspace. There was no hate involved in writing the post, which is more than I can say for the so called "anonymous" comments that are continually being submitted on this and on other Phil Spector blog posts. The blog is still on "moderation" and will continue to be for as long as I can foresee because I don't want the "hate" campaign in the comments on this nor any other post on my blog. Those nasty little notes will NOT see the light of day on this blog.
Posts
17 comments:
Lana - natural besuty
Rachelle - dime-store floozy
They both look very beautiful. Rachelle looks younger though.
Nice try, Anon (I mean Hey Paula or Rachelle herself!)
IMO, the important question to ask here is who looks BETTER? Lana, yes. Rachelle, no----plain at best, and a heavily made-up looking homely girl at the worst.
~Cor
ps. Fergy says hi Anakerie!
Just because I believe Rachelle looks younger (uh, probably cos she is!) does NOT mean that I must be Rachelle or HeyPaula? My my you need to chill and accept all people have their own opinions which may NOT agree with yours. Grow up!
Rachelle doesn't have a "youthful" look at all in my opinion. She's got a phony, plastic sort of look. I don't know why, but in a way her skin reminds me of Joan Rivers...
the "soul" rests in the eyes. Lana has kind eyes and Chelle has steely,cold eyes......might also be the contacts LOL
Joan Rivers, next you'll be saying she looks like Camilla Parker-Bowles lol...... Maybe you need new contacts.
Rachelle is a truly beautiful girl and looks amazing.
It would be great to see a pic of the wo-men who post in places like this that are critical of either Phil Spectors or even better, Rachelle Spectors looks.
Not only are you about zero substance , I'd bet you don't stack up very well in the looks department.
Further, Phil Spector had a major car accident in which he met the windshield face first. And he's going to be 70 years old. My bet is the same women who are infinitely ignorant and hateful here, don't stack up in the attractiveness department, even when they were 30. Probably on constant "diets" talking about how they hate what men are about but spend their waking moments logging on to the classifieds. LOL
To the anonymous poster (June 22, 2009 2:47PM): Exactly who are you trying to insult? Where in this post do you see an insult towards Spector?
Apparently you don't even have the courage to insult people using a name, real or imagined. You have the courage of most of the anonymous posters all over the internet blab it out and run. Takes a lot of courage, doesn't it? Perhaps you are so familiar with the ones you try to insult because you are one of them.
Too right anon @ 2.47 pm. I think you just may have hit the nail on the head with that one lol. Oh, and before you state Anakerie, we are NOT the same poster. There are more than one person in this world that disagrees with your opinion, believe it or not.
Well then, Anon #2, you and your buddy can play all you want for a couple more days before the automatic moderation kicks in for this post. Just watch your language and don't bash other people and I might just let your comments stay.
Oh I see its okay for you to bash other posters and the 'Spector did it' poster, but you cannot accept our posts. Uh, we are just replying to those!
Okie dokie, Anon #2, go read my latest post.
FYI, comment moderation has been reinstated again. Funny how it's the Spector fans who have caused the comment moderation to be enforced, both this time and the first time I had to enable it.
Spector's fans need to put their big girl/boy panties on and accept the fact that Phil Spector will be in prison for a long time to come. They also need to accept that there are a LOT of people who are not fans of Phil and Rachelle and there is nothing they can say or do to force people to believe the same as they do.
Considering the FACT that Lana was 40 when Rachelle's husband killed her (ANOTHER FACT) and the FACT Rachelle is now 29, Rachelle may look younger to some folks....I don't think that is the point though...who looks the worse for wear? RACHELLE HANDS DOWN!
Lana was beautiful inside and out. Too bad you can't say the same thing about Rachelle.
Post a Comment